Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?

Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While  how to block radiation from wifi router  but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since  how to reduce emf exposure  is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).


The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.